We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants



Forgotten password?


Dear readers,

our online journals are moving. The new (and old) issues of all journals can be found at
In most cases you can log in there directly with your e-mail address and your current password. Otherwise we ask you to register again. Thank you very much.

Your Quintessence Publishing House
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 35 (2020), No. 1     27. Jan. 2020
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 35 (2020), No. 1  (27.01.2020)

Page 91-99, doi:10.11607/jomi.7600, PubMed:31184640

Non-Cross-linked Versus Cross-linked Collagen Membrane in Maxillary Sinus Perforation Repair: A Comparative Histologic Study in a Rat Model
Chandra, Rampalli Viswa / Sneha, Kidambi / Reddy, Aileni Amarender
Purpose: To compare and evaluate maxillary sinus perforation repair, bone regeneration, and membrane degradation with cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen membranes in rat sinuses at 2, 4, and 10 weeks, respectively.
Materials and Methods: Fifty-one Sprague-Dawley rat models were included in the study. Bilateral maxillary sinus perforations were made with a straight bur. In the control site, cross-linked collagen membrane (Ossix Plus) was placed, and in the test site, non-cross-linked collagen membrane was used (Pro-Tiss). Euthanasia was carried out under carbon dioxide asphyxia where 17 rats were sacrificed at weeks 2, 4, and 10. Histologic evaluation of the specimens was subsequently done.
Results: At 2 (P = .001), 4 (P = .031), and 10 (P = .024) weeks, there was a significant regeneration of maxillary sinus lining in sites treated with non-cross-linked collagen membrane over the cross-linked collagen membrane. No significant differences were observed in measures of bone regeneration (P = .92; 10 weeks) and membrane degradation (P = .06; 4 weeks) at the end of the study period between the two groups.
Conclusion: The non-cross-linked collagen membrane appears to be more beneficial in maxillary sinus repair. However, it does not seem to confer additional benefits in bone regeneration or membrane degradation over cross-linked collagen membranes.

Keywords: cross-linked collagen, guided tissue regeneration, maxillary sinus, non-cross-linked collagen, soft tissue injuries
fulltext (no access granted) Endnote-Export