Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 (2009), Supplement 30. Oct. 2009
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 (2009), Supplement (30.10.2009)
Supplement, Page 92-109, PubMed:19885437
Computer Technology Applications in Surgical Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review
Jung, Ronald E. / Schneider, David / Ganeles, Jeffrey / Wismeijer, Daniel / Zwahlen, Marcel / Hämmerle, Christoph Hans Franz / Tahmaseb, Ali
Purpose: To assess the literature on accuracy and clinical performance of computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry.
Materials and Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted to collect information about (1) the accuracy and (2) clinical performance of computer-assisted implant systems. Meta-regression analysis was performed for summarizing the accuracy studies. Failure/complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 12-month proportions.
Results: Twenty-nine different image guidance systems were included. From 2,827 articles, 13 clinical and 19 accuracy studies were included in this systematic review. The meta-analysis of the accuracy (19 clinical and preclinical studies) revealed a total mean error of 0.74 mm (maximum of 4.5 mm) at the entry point in the bone and 0.85 mm at the apex (maximum of 7.1 mm). For the 5 included clinical studies (total of 506 implants) using computer-assisted implant dentistry, the mean failure rate was 3.36% (0% to 8.45%) after an observation period of at least 12 months. In 4.6% of the treated cases, intraoperative complications were reported; these included limited interocclusal distances to perform guided implant placement, limited primary implant stability, or need for additional grafting procedures.
Conclusion: Differing levels and quantity of evidence were available for computer-assisted implant placement, revealing high implant survival rates after only 12 months of observation in different indications and a reasonable level of accuracy. However, future long-term clinical data are necessary to identify clinical indications and to justify additional radiation doses, effort, and costs associated with computer-assisted implant surgery.
Keywords: computer-assisted implant dentistry, dental implants, navigation