We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 (1989), No. 2     1. June 1989
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 (1989), No. 2  (01.06.1989)

Page 95-105


A Comparative Study of Results with Various Endosseous Implant Systems
d'Hoedt, B. / Schulte, W.
The results of regular follow-up of various endosseous titanium implant systems are presented together with an overview of the results with Tübingen Frialit® aluminum oxide ceramic implants. Using ITI implants, pathological findings for sulcus depth and peri-implant bone degradation were found significantly more frequently than with the other titanium implants. Clinical mobility was present significantly more frequently with TPS implants than with the IMZ system, whereas an increase in the depth of the peri-implant sulcus alone occurred significantly more frequently with the IMZ and ITI than with the TPS implant system. The observation period for Brånemark implants is too short to permit final evaluation. However, pathological findings have not occurred to date.

Keywords: Brånemark implant, endosseous implant, IMZ implant, ITI implant, recall, titanium, TPS implant, Tübingen Frialit implant