We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants



Forgotten password?


Dear readers,

our online journals are moving. The new (and old) issues of all journals can be found at
In most cases you can log in there directly with your e-mail address and your current password. Otherwise we ask you to register again. Thank you very much.

Your Quintessence Publishing House
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 (1994), No. 6     1. Nov. 1994
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 (1994), No. 6  (01.11.1994)

Page 711-718

Free-Standing vs Tooth-Connected Implant Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: A Comparative Retrospective Clinical Study of the Prosthetic Results
Cavicchia, Fabrizio / Bravi, Fabrizio
The opportunity to connect implants and teeth has been discussed in the literature. A comparative retrospective study was performed to evaluate the prosthetic results obtained in our clinical experience with 31 free-standing and 30 tooth-connected posterior IMZ implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Complications such as the loosening and fracture of fixation screws and abutments, ceramic fractures, and natural tooth migration were observed. A significant difference in the incidence and types of such complications in the two groups was found: problems occurred more frequently and in a different pattern with the free-standing compared to tooth connected restorations. Possible explanations for this dissimilar behavior are discussed.

Keywords: complications, free-standing, implant-supported fixed partial dentures, intramobile elements, proprioception, tooth-connected
fulltext (no access granted) Endnote-Export