We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants



Forgotten password?


Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27 (2012), No. 6     1. Dec. 2012
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27 (2012), No. 6  (01.12.2012)

Page 1554-1559, PubMed:23189310

Two-Year Follow-up of Early- and Conventionally-Placed Two-Stage Implants Supporting Fixed Prostheses
Bekcioglu, Burak / Sagirkaya, Elcin / Karasoy, Durdu / Cehreli, Murat
Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the biologic and prosthetic outcomes of early- and conventionally-placed implants supporting fixed prostheses.
Materials and Methods: Using inclusion/ exclusion criteria, early- and conventionally-placed implant patient groups, rehabilitated with Brånemark System implants supporting fixed prostheses for 2 years, were selected from the patient archives. Kaplan- Meier survival estimates, time-dependent marginal bone loss, Plaque Index, peri-implant infection, Bleeding Index scores, and prosthetic complications data of the groups were compared.
Results: A total of 212 implants were placed in early-placed (n = 42, 101 implants) and conventionally-placed (n = 45, 111 implants) patient groups and 5 implants failed during the 2-year follow-up. The 1- and 2-year Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities of early-placed (0.98) and conventionally-placed (0.973) groups were comparable (P =.735). The 6-month to 2-year marginal bone loss in the conventionally-placed group was higher than in the earlyplaced group (P < .05). There were differences between groups on soft tissue scores between the 2 years of function (P < .05). The frequency of prosthetic complications was very low and comparable in both groups (P = .476).
Conclusions: Early- and conventionally-placed implants supporting fixed prostheses showed comparable clinical outcomes during the 2-year follow-up, although the marginal bone loss was higher in the latter group.

Keywords: conventional implant placement, early implant placement, marginal bone loss, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetic complication