We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 (2013), No. 6     20. Dec. 2013
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 (2013), No. 6  (20.12.2013)

Page 1470-1482, doi:10.11607/jomi.2945, PubMed:24278914


Long-term Outcome of One-Piece Implants. Part II: Prosthetic Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis
Barrachina-Díez, José M. / Tashkandi, Esam / Stampf, Susanne / Att, Wael
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term clinical performance of prosthetic reconstructions on one-piece implants, with a focus on technical and biological complications.
Materials and Methods: An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by a manual search was conducted to identify randomized and prospective controlled clinical trials on one-piece implants. Additional inclusion criteria were a mean follow-up period of at least 5 years and an inception cohort where more than 80% of the enrolled patients remained in the study at the 5- or 10-year observation point.
Results: Sixty-six studies from an initial yield of 597 titles were selected, and the data were extracted. Of the full-text articles examined, 46 were excluded and a total of 20 articles were finally selected. All studies were published between 1995 and 2011. Two different study designs were identified: 4 randomized controlled trials and 16 prospective cohort studies. The studies were analyzed and classified according to study type, patient characteristics, prosthetic characteristics, and biologic and technical complications after 5 and 10 years. The meta-analysis of the included studies showed a prosthetic survival rate for one-piece, one-part implants of 82.81% after 5 years and 97.85% and 98.24% in two-part implants after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Although the prosthetic survival rates were high, complications were frequent: complications of the suprastructure (18.44% to 18.75%), screw loosening/fracture (7.64%), soft-tissue complications (4.69% to 8.25%), sensory disturbances (0.36% to 6.25%), implant loss before loading (0% to 0.23%) and during function (1.10% to 3.21%), and implant fracture (0.0004%).
Conclusion: Within the limits of this systematic review, it can be concluded that despite high long-term prosthetic survival rates, technical and biologic complications are frequent in one-piece implants, both in one-part and two-part designs. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to provide more information about the outcome of different variables associated with this type of implant design.